![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
I thought the blade is a very decent blade! Has a settled old look to it, and definitely made by a pandai who knew what he was doing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
These keris where as mentioned Madura style keris and probably made in madura for the Dutch soldiers to bring back home. Especially Madura was very loyal to the Dutch. This loyalty is represented in some styles of the maduran ukiran full of Dutch symbolism
I already mentioned in another thread that these kind of keris are worth to find a place in a keris collection. A real keris blade in a mostly good carved but also a dress of lower quality of used wood representing a historical period. Until now i've seen two styles of this soldiers keris if i may call it so. Both styles are shown in this thread. Here in Holland you couldn't enter an auction house or fleemarket without stumbling over some of these keris. Today they start to become more rare to find. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,228
|
![]()
Well, as Alan has pointed out this dress form was a legitimate one that was favored my Europeans and so it became associated with them due to their desire to have these elaborate carvings for keris they returned home with. But we would probably be a bit off base to assume that they were always made specifically for Dutch soldiers. And for the most part i think the blades in them were not made for them either. Just old blades they managed to collect and have re-dressed in this form. Because of this i think we see a great deal of variation in the quality of blades we find in this dress, but usually they are not top-notch blades. We also see a wide range in the quality of the dress itself.
Is it not possible that we might find one of these in Madura where it was owned by a Maduran and never meant to be a soldier's souvenir? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
David,
Very good question. The blades where older blades indeed and mostly not top-notch blades. In my opinion and that's why you see them so much here in Holland is that these dresses were purely made for bringback gifts for mainly the Dutch soldiers and other Dutch employees in those days. In my opinion the Maduran owned keris in their proper maduran dress and not in dress of lower quality wood, that was used for these bringback kerisses. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,347
|
![]() Quote:
look at the extravagant carving of the Donoriko hilts ! ![]() If this sheer exuberance in the carver's art can be practiced in this medium then why not in the Wrongkos and Gandars of Madura keris ? So I would disagree that these were purely "Visitor" oriented works . Visitor influenced, perhaps; or was it assimilation into the culture ? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Rick,
There are carved maduran wrongko's en gandars and if i remembered well in a thread about maduran scabbards a wrongko with lying lion is shown. In that case i completely agree with you. But the keris type we are discussing here are dressed in lesser quality wood which makes quicker carving possible. This quality wouldnt be the choice of a maduran for his kerisblade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 928
|
![]()
Another carved madura wrongko
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,047
|
![]()
Henk, you're a better man than me.
I simply cannot tell with any certainty the quality of the wood in chregu's scabbard. What I can see is a reasonably close grained wood that supports a reasonably fine carving pattern, the scabbard is old, but the pattern of the carving has not collapsed; the wood looks as if it has been stained black, but the area on the hilt where it has worn through seems to have a reddish colour, so it is possible that this wood might be sawo, which does have similar grain and support characteristics, if it is sawo, it is not a low quality wood, but quite a respectable wood. If the wood has not been stained black, it might be sono--- but it doesn't really look like sono---and again, sono is a decent wood. Since you have been able to detect that this is a low quality wood, could you please tell us how you were able to know this from the photos. Thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,228
|
![]() Quote:
My statement about looking in the wrong boxes at flea markets was punctuated with a wink and a smile. It was meant in jest. I am sorry that you missed the joke. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|