|
18th May 2009, 02:32 PM
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
I completely agree with Ariel. The earlier-dated cartouches are too common on later blades, and this blade suggests it as such. It is very doubtful a 15th Century blade. The heavily patinated crossguard like this is not necessarily an indication of 500 y.o. age, it's shape also suggests 18/19 Cent.
But, Ariel, I'd call it a Shamshir. Should a Kilic have yelman? |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode