![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#19 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 7,085
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The keris shown on P. 234 of Tammens, Vol. 2  does not share the same characteristics as the keris posted by gwirya. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	The Tammens example appears to be a ligan, or keris pedang; I say "appears to be", because all we can see is the outline of the blade. One thing is certain:- it is most definitely not a keris of cundrik form.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |