![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
Thanks Rand. It looks more complicated than I thought. Fiegel book, for example, shows much easier process - simply cutting the line with the chisel, but he mentioned press and dies as well.
I understand now that the technique would be the same for producing any lines, vertical, angled, etc, however only vertical lines (Kirk) pattern was used almost exclusively. I am sure it's because of "40 steps", i.e. ladder concept. Can we assume that zig-zag, cross, etc variations were made as experiment, decoration, etc, hence are not associated with the "Kirk" pattern? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 539
|
Quote:
My opinion is any multiple of twenty would be associated with the kirk-nar-daban or ladder pattern. Other than that would call them rungs or in the style of a ladder pattern. rand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
Great dagger Alex.
Kirk Narduban is a miss spelling from Turkish Kirk Merdeven Forty Steps I think its in the Pinchot shamshir article. Ive seen just as many sword blades that have 40 steps as others that dont but never seen less than 20. On a dagger theres less space I dont think it matters so long as steps are clear and equally spaced. Anybody wants to sell a ladder blade because it has less than 40 steps lmk. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 163
|
Cutting the ingot and opening up like in the photo will NOT produce any rungs...it is a perpetuated myth and a lot of extra work for no benefit.
Ric |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|