![]() |
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 119
|
something i noticed right away was that the blade was shorter (only 23 inches long) than most tulwars ive seen before. perhaps this made it a better hand to hand combat weapon than the longer horseback tulwars?
maybe it was an infantry weaspon? |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|