![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
Hi Samsol,
You need to post some pictures in order for us to help you ID the keris. You can do so using the "Attach Files" function when you post a new message. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 100
|
![]()
This is exciting. I've always wondered what a dateable blade from that period would look like
![]() Hope the pictures come up soon |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Land below the wind
Posts: 135
|
![]()
Samsol,
Is that the keris mentioned in this press release? http://www.terengganutourism.com/press%20release3.htm Been waiting to see pictures of it and it doesn't seem "long" as mentioned in the releases (described as a "long keris"). What are the measurements? Looks a touch of Bugis? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
So far, I've only seen Sumatran kerises with rattan bound around the lower part of the batang. But without seeing the original sampir (corroded away) and the blade, its really a big question mark.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 327
|
![]()
Why is it believed that this ship was made in the Philippines? Is these any way to post the X-rays & any dimensions of whatever possible. When first found they were refering to this as a sundang, now a keris, which for all purpose is the same, I guess. Seems from what is available to be more a Moro Kris or Bugis Sundang.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 940
|
![]()
Cool!
![]() I agree with John that it doesn't appear particularly long, but the pictures could be deceptive. It doesn't appear to be a sundang. Bill, do you have a link to the releases that referred to it as such? I would have to disagree that a sundang and a keris are the same thing for all purposes, as you say. Kissing cousins, perhaps. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
|
![]()
Well, I'll admit I'm confused.
That third illustration looks like an x-ray view of a 9 or 11 luk blade inside the sheath. Am I the only one who sees it? All the comments I'm reading suggest that either no one else is seeing the posted pictures, or that I'm interpreting the last two in a dramatically different way than everyone else is. What does everyone else see in the last two images? Fearn |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 327
|
![]()
Think this must be the wreck that was mentioned awhile back, when it was first announced, it was mentioned in this forum. Seen the "Keris Sundang" label quite abit, think its even on a Malay postage stamp. Wonder why its being refered to as a Portuguese ship built in the PI, not doubting the experts, just interested in, why? Seems more likely the Portuguese would have seized the ship in an engagement or outright pirated it, than commissioned it. In this time period Spain & Portuguese had a treaty dividing the PI for Spain, & Celebes, Spice Islands to the later; but they both constantly violated thier agreement. Early Bugis did rely on the PI for its boat building so it does make sence the Portuguese in Celebes might do the same.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|