![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Java
Posts: 137
|
![]() Quote:
Wa'alaikum salaam Mas Bram.. Selamat Maulid Nabi juga, Also I really thank you for your comment about my keris, Rick. I hope useful for all of us to learning the keris. ..... Mas Bram, I feel we didn't talking about the keris by email for long time ya ![]() Actually me my self just has a little expertise and experiences about the keris. So far, I'm still learning too.. So, perhaps I gave wrong opinion too.. And it shown that discussion, learning about local cultures, go to keris market and many places where the keris made are very important to do. ... .... Indeed that the luks of my Pamekasan keris is more rengkol (wavier ?) than Oversky's keris. I had posted 2 pictures of Pamekasan keris which has different luks style. The second keris has wavier luks than first keris. So, both of these Pamekasan keris has different luks style, but has same characters of pamor style, iron work, gandik style, and pamor layers. Luks style is just one indocators to analysis the tangguh of the keris. Other indicators is gandik style. Here I posted the pictures of Pamekasan keris without kembang kacang. So, the style of the gandik is similiar with Oversky's keris. Pamekasan keris has gandik which more aslant (oblique) that usually Sumenep or Tuban keris. In the other side, layers of iron and pamor of Pamekasan keris is more little than usually Jawanese keris. At back side (Wadidang), the wavy Pamekasan keris usually has Ron Dha Nunut, and the Oversky's keris have it too. And if I can handed Oversky's keris by my self, I supposed that it havier than usually Jawanese keris. So, I supposed that his keris is Tangguh Pamekasan. And for the estimating era, Pamekasan keris like this usually made on Mataram era (about 17-18th century). Well, that is my humble opinion, Mas Bram... Wassalaam, Hidayat. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|