![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Jens,
thanks again for your input... ![]() Hi Richard, my main concern was to leave some of the sword's age by not removing all its 'history'. My compromise was to get one side of the blade in a condition that would show any pattern (wootz) clearly, onced etched. The other side is more pitted and 'displays' its 'antiquity' better. The blade although slightly thinner than the average sword blade, is flexible but strong. The hilt is 'tight' (as in Tulwar) , or very tight ...bearing in mind the original padding would 'pack it out' a little. In the hand the sword is fast and very very slightly 'top' heavy .....but feel that is due to length. Hi Jim, Thanks for your informative post, and you have given me more leads to research .....which I appreciate ![]() Very pleased indeed, to have acquired a sword with , potentially, a very colourful past. A sword I will truly treasure ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|