![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 79
|
![]()
G'day All,
I've become a bit confused by this thread. I have always believed that SLINGSHOTS and CATAPAULTS were two different types of implements, the former requiring only a sling and the latter requiring some form of device for instant propulsion. In my experience, hand-held catapaults in the Malay Archipelago (until the late '50s , anyway) were basically of two types: - Y-prong: fashioned from a naturally-occuring branch of a tree, or one fashioned from a block of wood. The 'elastics' of the sling were fixed to the verticals. - A block of wood carved into a handle with extra length above the grip of the same dimensions as the grip. On this extra length was 'gouged'/carved a small prong to fix the 'elastics' of the sling. Generally, the more skillful one was, the smaller the Y-prong, the second type having the smallest prong of all. The 'elastic' was usually an inner tyre tube, cut to suit. I have never seen an adult use one of these implements, since there were countless alternatives for them. There were basically two methods of launching the projectile: - aiming at the target in a straight-line motion. ( This method has caused many accidents for the unwary, the projectile hitting the thumb or ricocheting off the 'Y' to hit other parts of the body) - aiming at the target in a 'parabolic' motion. BTW, in the UK in the '50s, metal-frame catapaults were available (the 'Y' looking more like a horseshoe with a handle), usually from a sports stores. ![]() I would be most grateful for any elucidation/enlightenment. Cheers. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|