Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 8th October 2006, 04:10 PM   #3
Jens Nordlunde
Member
 
Jens Nordlunde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
Default

Thanks Greg,

I seem to remember that it, in some places in Siberia, can be as cold as –70 C during winter, but this is in special places, not everywhere. I have never tried –40 C, only –25 C, and I found that pretty cold, as it always blows where I lived at the time.

From the text it seems as if the Rus’s/Vikings swords had a bigger chance to ‘survive’ than the blades made of crucible steel. I know the description says a softer core and hard edges, but somewhere else I have seen that they also used soft and hard steel forged together.

On page 169 he writes: “Phosphorus affects the hardness as well as giving the iron very pale etching optical properties”. The two authors don’t agree much with the last statement, and earlier in the book they state that al-Biruni is less reliable than al-Kindi, but what about the Phosphorous affect?

If you don’t have the book, maybe you should try to have a look at it in a library – I think toy will like it.

Jens
Jens Nordlunde is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.