Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 23rd November 2025, 04:44 PM   #1
Bob A
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by serdar View Post
Metal from 12 century from one foundry is diferent from fake, but if this is original it can have similar metal composition like 12 century known original.

Fake is never good, they are made for scaming people.
Its beter to buy cheap modern reproduction and hang, than to buy fake.
I suspect a sophisticated (and therefore expensive) analysis of the metallurgy involved in this sword might actually be determinative, though I admit a paucity of knowledge on the subject. A sword made a millennium ago would likely have indicators of its age. Perhaps modern forgers might go to the trouble of smelting and forging in a fashion to imitate the earlier processes, but it would be pretty troublesome to do so, done in the hope of a payoff equal to the effort involved.

Regarding the value of a forgery, I have no quibble with your ethical stance; my thought, which I ought to have qualified at the time of writing, concerned the educational value of demonstrating the process of fakery, and alerting the unwary.
Bob A is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.