Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2nd August 2025, 06:14 AM   #15
thomas hauschild
Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 144
Default

I think there will be the same issues with the molar tooth. If declared as mammoth molar too. A hundred years ago nobody dig for mammoth molar in siberia or alaska while these tooth were availiable from the same source as tusk…….asian elephants. My informations are that all kind of materials from elephants are banned like molar tooth and leather ( if you had the chance to hold elephant leather in your hand you well ever identify it). The chance to get „trouble“ with customs will be lower..maybe.

Schreger lines in tusk will be different from elephant and mammoth. A research will give the possibility to proof if it‘s mammouth or not and a possibility for customs to decide if illegal or not. I do not know if there are visible differences if you compare molar tooth. So there will be a risk if you just say „believe me it is mammoth“ As a knifemaker I have grinded some fresh molar and some mammoth molar. The smell is realy different. And the color was nearly the same from that fresh tooth in comparison to that grips on the pictures above.


Best Thomas
thomas hauschild is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.