![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 142
|
![]()
I'll qualify my 'C18th' as late C18th, so not far off your 1800 date. Can I find the pictures of the examples I saw... nope. I recall a canted hilt on a so-called 'flank officers sword' by Read of Dublin, so last part of the C18th ie before the 1803 pattern appears.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,512
|
![]()
Then there is this oddball Ive had about 45 years. I had always regarded it as an early variant of the 1796 light cavalry saber (in fact in was included in an article on such variants by Eric Troldhuus of the Danish Arms and Armour Society in the 90s). In some Caucasian sabers such as the skirted shashka, it seemed perhaps some of the ethnic influences such as Tatar from these might have come into play. However that assumption would be pretty tenuous.
What is even more interesting on this is the extremely parabolic shamshir blade with the pipeback blade somewhat popular in early British sabers. In this early period from the time Henry Osborn was developing the regulation British light cavalry saber of 1796, there were considerations of tulwars, shamshirs and other ethnographic forms, so perhaps this might have been some sort of prototype,...so many mysteries! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,184
|
![]()
I remember this amazing sword you posted in the past, Jim. I swear I saw one extremely similar in an old 90's sword catalog from our friend in Illinois.
![]() I'll have to try and track that one down. In the mean-time, thanks everyone for the feedback. The canted blade examples are indeed interesting. Nathan Starr is associated with these types as already mentioned. So are the Virginia Manufactory swords of the early Federalist period ca. 1805-10. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|