![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: In the wee woods north of Napanee Ontario
Posts: 394
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,255
|
![]()
Thanks to all for the informative comments and the educational video. The sword seems a departure from earlier, shorter cutlasses that I have encountered, with its 28" blade it reminds me more of a cavalry sword as opposed to a cutlass. It must have encompassed a new theory of shipboard fighting whereas, earlier with the exception of boarding pikes, I had always thought that short swords and axes were used in the close, crowded boarding actions.
Also, I am surprised that they developed a new cutlass in 1889, as I would have thought that they would be obsolete by then. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 74
|
![]()
28" is hardly long, infantry swords were a standard 32" and cavalry swords generally longer than that with 34" to 36" being common and some were longer again.
As for being late, the last British cavalry pattern sword was the 1908, since the Russo Japenese war had appeared to show that cavalry charges remained effective. WWI came as a nasty shock to military planners. Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 343
|
![]() Quote:
The last pattern was 1900 (even more obsolete) and was very similar to the 1889 but with a remodelled grip and the blade had a fuller. CC |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|