![]() |
|
|
#6 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,537
|
Quote:
That is a nice kris. As for age, it has none of the characteristics of an archaic form from the 18th C, and I would put it no earlier than mid-19th C, and most probably late 19th C. As David noted, the presence of suassa requires testing for gold content. The absence of patina means very little. Ian |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|