![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 166
|
![]()
The second purchase was another unusual blade profile. this one was atributed to the island of Palawan by the dealer. The scabbard is obviously new and the stain came off when I tried to clean it (I repaired that) additionally the front and upper carving are one piece while the back and lower carving are another. The scabbard design struck Ian as Visayan but the dealer said it was Palawan. The blade itself appears older, the ferrule has a piece missing underneath and is worn thin at this break. The crest has some primitive carving on only one side and the beak is traingular? Of course as soon as Ian showed any interest at all I put it in my pile
![]() Last edited by wilked aka Khun Deng; 25th January 2005 at 02:09 PM. Reason: spelling |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 312
|
![]()
Beyond the beak, and full wrap. According to Robert Cato, a sure fire sign (because not all post WWII barungs are fully wrapped) of a post WWII barong is the center ridge in the scabbard. I like the first one. The blade looks watered. They are still making good watered blades in Sulu today. The pinkish stuff is a modern epoxy, that starts appearing after WWII along with TVs and Coca-cola.
Palawan contains many Visayans. So possibly a Visayan made it in Palawan. Palawan is an interesting blend of ethnic groups. It does contain Visayan elements, but I am with the dealer on this one. Though perhaps new scabbard, old sword? The blade appears similar to alot of WWII era blades Ive seen. Long and slend fighters, just perfect against Japanese officers. Though of course, that is just a guess. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|