![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,459
|
![]() Quote:
Kubur, I am extremely pleased that we have 'one' point of agreement! I cannot resist feeling a sense of triumph. ![]() On the tughra, I think we have here a matter of Rorschach perspective. While these symbolic devices used as personal seals and monogram or heraldic emblems, which have long Turkic history, are regarded as Ottoman, they were widely used in other cases in degree following the Ottoman style. In looking at the systemic dynamics of the 'tughra', which to me always looked a bit like an amoeba (in a sense, and leaning toward the psychological context of course, as per Rorschach).......this device does not seem to follow 'tughra' conventions'. Perhaps this was how I might have said what you may have regarded as tughra heresy ![]() Obviously I do not share your expertise on these, so I hope you might enlighten me (and others reading) on the spectrum of tughra variants which are outside the set patterns I have attached. Also attached is the device on the sword posted which looks more like an 'ace of clubs' in the playing card suit system. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|