![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 692
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			What was that? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	6620913376 I've almost bid on that. Certainly not moroccan. Looks indian, has a ricasso, nice khanjar hilt, but....    any ideas?
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Ann Arbor, MI 
				
				
					Posts: 5,503
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I agree, the dagger looks Indian and quite practical. No info on the quality of steel, but superficially looks OK, mid 20th century, perhaps? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	As to the adjective Moroccan: please notice that the seller did not say that the dagger was Moroccan, only the leather. Moroccan leather is almost a trademark, more of a mark of quality and technololy than the origin. It is natural, mostly horse or camel, not bonded, very pliable and strong. Surprisingly, a lot of it is (and always was!) actually manufactured in Nigeria and brought to Morocco and from there to Europe. In Europe it was used for furniture, belts/bags and, especially, for book binding. If you see an 18th-19th century Bible with still astonishingly intact cover, it is likely to be covered in Moroccan leather. Lower quality stuff was bonded: layers and scraps glued on top of each other; those invariably started crumbling after ~ 10 years. I have a friend who is into "first editions" and this is as elementary to him as "turkish ribbon" vs. "hairpin" to us. In short, Moroccan leather is like Damascus steel: made anywhere, with Damascus as the distribution point.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |