![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
David,
I see your point. The blade is wider than typical with far more shallow luks, but when I look at the whole thing in its entirety it strikes me as archaic, even more so if it etches out to a twistcore. We can surely agree that it is at least early 19th century. I think Battara may have a good point as well...that it is a variation of the "archaic" form. I hate getting tied into jargon that is too "rule-making" on these type of issues because it has been my experience that every time we think we have found a line or defining feature, there can be an exception to the rule. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|