7th May 2016, 09:29 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
|
Ottoman Tufuk Carbine
Hello all.
Here is a new aquistion. This is a rather plain example, with minimum decoration. In fact, it's a bit difficult to see the brass decoration. The patina is so dark it almost blends with the stock stain. There is a makers mark on the lock and barrel. And there is a stress crack on the bottom of the butt stock. The lock is in working order, but needs cleaned and adjustment. The barrel has light engraving with a cannon style muzzle and measures right at .60 caliber. And there's some light engraving on the barrel. In fact, the barrel looks some-what Persian. But probably not. Anyway, this gun will clean up and restore nicely, with minimum fuss. Here's some pics. Thanks for looking. Rick |
7th May 2016, 09:31 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
|
SOME MORE PICS...............
|
7th May 2016, 09:33 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
|
STILL MORE..........
|
8th May 2016, 03:37 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
Hi Rick,
Beautiful and nothing is missing! I see what you mean with the "Persian" stamp on the barrel, the Ottomans did that too. I suspect your barrel to be old...Is it possible to have an 18th c. barrel? Its a simple tufek but very complete. Can you use an oil or a wax to show the difference of wood used for the butt? Which kind of wood is it? Best, Kubur |
8th May 2016, 03:40 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
On the lock, normaly the stamp is in the middle of the circle.
Is it possible that the guy was drunk and missed the circle to stamp the edge of the barrel? |
9th May 2016, 11:28 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
Quote:
|
|
10th May 2016, 08:50 AM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,739
|
Quote:
|
|
10th May 2016, 09:32 AM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
Quote:
Kubur |
|
10th May 2016, 08:51 PM | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
Quote:
|
|
11th May 2016, 01:21 AM | #10 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
|
Quote:
Yes the gun is mostly complete. Even the original ramrod, which the patina matches the barrel exactly. Yes, the barrel really does look old. It would not surprise me if the barrel was 18th Century, and re-stocked sometime in the first half of the 19th Century. I'll let you know about the wood. The whole gun needs a good (correct) cleaning. I can do this while the lock is being cleaned and adjusted. Again, the barrel does look really old. I checked, and it's not loaded. LOL Rick |
|
11th May 2016, 01:22 AM | #11 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
|
Quote:
Rick |
|
11th May 2016, 01:39 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
Grand looking gun, Rick!!
Hard to date these barrels, as they were used over and over. Not loaded............that is good. :-) Just got a matchlock from the UK. Had a firework, some sand and a 6" oval nail down the barrel! |
11th May 2016, 02:24 AM | #13 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
|
Quote:
FRONT AND REAR WOOD OF THE BUTT STOCK: The wood on the rear of the butt stock is definately different than the wood on the grip area and forearm. but as Kubur mentios, this is quite common. It's a bit hard to tell in the photos because the gun really needs cleaned. But in this case, I believe the butt section was original to the gun. One reason I believe this is that the sharp edges of both pieces are rounded/worn equally. And the brass nails on the brass strap all match with the same patina. What is intersting is the butt cap section being held in by two wood dowels rather than long nails like you usually see. But I've seen many of these with both the same, and different woods used. If it was changed, it was certainly done back in the period sometime. But again, a good cleaning will tell me more. Rick. |
|
11th May 2016, 02:28 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
|
Actually, it's also missing one of the small brass decorations on the left side, and there are 3-4 small worm lines. But the brass will be easy to replace.
It is nice getting the original ramrod, which rarely shows up on these guns. Rick |
11th May 2016, 05:20 AM | #15 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
Quote:
It looks like the butt end was not cut evenly, is that just from the angle? |
|
12th May 2016, 01:27 PM | #16 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
|
Quote:
|
|
12th May 2016, 01:30 PM | #17 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
|
Quote:
No, it's just the angle of the photo. There appears a small, old repair on the edge. I'll take another photo so you can see. (as soon as my camera battery is recharged Rick |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|