![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
Quote:
On analysis Hounslo or Hownsloe or Hownslow swords carried entirely different marks often based on the Me Fecit script and variations of it. I can find no proof of marks of Hounslow of any kind of Fox... Clearly then SH and H were two marks inside the Running Fox outline of the Harveys and also Harvey and apparently a HAR and a VEY under...as a block inscription with no fox at all. Regards, Ibrahiim al Balooshi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
I have found a most interesting note on http://www.mocavo.co.uk/The-Victoria...2-3/704590/320 which may have escaped scrutiny... This old volume places many things in perspective...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,789
|
Ibrahiim,
Thank you so much for always adding these interesting and astute observations and especially these remarkably pertinent links! These additions perfectly illustrate that researching these weapons and the intriguing elements of their unique histories often involves forays into most unexpected and obscure sources. These are the kinds of details which truly add to the dimension of our understanding and appreciation of these arms! Best regards, Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
Quote:
Salaams Jim, It is a pleasure to take part albeit as a virtual observer in this masterclass originated by Cathey. Your input is an enormous inspiration to all Forum members especially those who enjoy, as I do, the potential for research ... Regards, Ibrahiim al Balooshi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: adelaide south australia
Posts: 284
|
Hi Guys
I have posted one of my three Black Watch pattern baskets early in this thread, so I will now post the remaining two, starting with this one. Date Circa 1750-70 (18th Century) Overall Length: 92.2 cm (36.3 inches) Blade length: 76.4 cm (30.1 inches) Blade widest point: 3.121 cm (1.2 inches) Hilt widest point: 13.3 cm (5.2 inches) Inside grip length: 11.3 cm (4.4 inches) Marks, etc: The Pommel is marked with an F over 20 Description English basket-hilted backsword for highland regiments (42nd Royal Highland Regiment), c1760 with 30.2” blade 76.5 cm. Overall Length 36 ¾ “ 93.3 cm. A Scottish military basket hilted backsword issued to the 42nd Highlanders, circa 1750-1770, straight single edged fullered blade. Regulation hilt, panels pierced with triangular and circular openings. Truncated conical pommel (marked with an F over 20) with spherical button, wire bound leather grip. This hilt is typical of those manufactured by Dru Drury Sr, London, however as the blade is unsigned this cannot be confirmed. Whilst this pattern of basket hilt is usually regarded as having been produced by Jeffery’s or Dury, it is probable that Jeffery’s and Drury sub-contracted for finished guards, pommels and blades from Birmingham and assembled them at their London Workshops utilizing their own grips and grip coverings. If anyone has any thoughts on what the F over 20 signifies on the pommel I would be most grateful. References: BEZDEK, Richard H. SWORDS AND SWORD MAKERS OF ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND Pp341 DARLING, Anthony D. SWORDS FOR THE HIGHLAND REGIMENTS 1757 - 1784 NEUMANN, George G. SWORDS AND BLADES OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION pp71, plate 30.s & pp142 plate 241.S Wallis & Wallis Connoisseur Auction Autumn 2001 9-10/10/2001 Lot 100 Cheers Cathey and Rex |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
Quote:
Salaams Cathey, May I ask is the letter an F or could it be an E ? Regards, Ibrahiim al Balooshi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,789
|
It seems I have seen these kind of letter/number inscriptions on others of these British basket hilts. Naturally my inclination would be that it would likely be a rack number as these were to other ranks. While it is a thought to possibly be production number or maker/vendor number as these components were outsourced usually, I doubt something in lots like pommels would be so marked.
This military pattern is of course most interesting, and the producers named are the most typically seen. I have seen these hilts with what appeared to be a M1788 light cavalry sabre blade, and wonder how these might have been issued in the latter 18th century with curved blade. Flank company perhaps? Eljay, any thoughts? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|