|
6th December 2014, 02:39 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
I fully expected it :-)
|
6th June 2015, 05:48 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Well, after a long interruption, I want to show 2 more chooras.
The is a long friendly argument between myself and another member about the age of a choora as a pattern. In his opinion choora appeared only in the 20 th century as a modification of Karud. Here are two chooras bought originally at an auction in Scotland. Their scabbards are in a sorry shape, but both carry paper labels dated 1854 and 1840. The daggers and their scabbards fit each other perfectly: no doubt original.Since the daggers themselves are not dated, as usual for the Afghani stuff, I did the next best thing: contacted Dr. Cathleen Baker from the Department of Restoration and Preservation of the University of Michigan Library. She is a world-renown expert on all things printed: paper, ink, techniques, bindings etc, former President and member of the Board of Directors of professional societies in her field, and the author of books and articles on the history of printing materials and techniques. She examined the chooras ( magnifying equipment, UV and infrared lights, some chemical analysis), and in her professional opinion the physical condition of the labels and their materials ( papers, inks) are compatible with the mid-19th century or earlier, and incompatible with 20th century. Together with the dates, this seems to clinch the issue: chooras existed in the pattern known till today even in the middle of the 19th century. Gentlemen, I give you 2 oldest dated chooras known to man and beast :-) And of the beasts: please look at the pics of the handle of the bigger choora: rhino? |
6th June 2015, 06:13 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
Dear Ariel.
No one is arguing that the very old papers. But no one can say when the papers were glued (50 years ago or 100 years ago). And most importantly, why ... In addition, you're kind of writing in Russian forum that besides numbers (not necessarily the date) on pieces of paper are many other words that you no one could translate into English So do not be in such a hurry, saying that these chooras 19th century. |
6th June 2015, 06:25 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Mahratt, you have your opinion about dating chooras, I have mine, and we have discussed it many times.
Why wouldn't we put our differences aside and let the Forumites decide for themselves whether they view expert opinion sufficiently convincing. OK? As to the origin of the handle, I am making arrangements to take it to our Museum of Natural History and have the real experts look at it. Meanwhile, the Forumites are free to express their opinions. Last edited by ariel; 6th June 2015 at 06:40 PM. |
6th June 2015, 06:42 PM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
And why do you need an expert to determine the horn? Suffice it to another photo of a certain angle. |
|
6th June 2015, 07:17 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Why wouldn't we both remain quiet and let the Forumites speak?
|
6th June 2015, 07:47 PM | #7 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,061
|
Just my 2 cents...
Clearly these papers have been attached to these sheaths for a very long time. If this was an attempt to deceive about the age of these sheaths it would be a very good forgery indeed. Better, sharper photographs would beg helpful though, Ariel. But if we do assume that the papers were in place for a very long time i don't see that someone even 50 years ago would bother to try to deceive anyone with dates just 100 years previous. What would be the point? Ariel took the time and effort to have these papers scientifically analyzed. I see no reason, therefore, to doubt the dating of these sheaths give the age of the paper. Even if the numbers themselves do not represent dates, the paper and ink has been proven to be 19th century, so i find little to doubt with this finding. I also don't see why expert examination to determine whether or not the handle is rhino is a bad thing. Photographs can be deceptive, and if you are not too offended by this professional photographer's opinion Ariel, your photographs are just not clear enough to really determine anything for sure. So personally i would welcome your expert's testimony from the Museum of Natural History. Why would anyone not welcome such evidence? |
6th June 2015, 06:20 PM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
Take a picture please, so that could be seen a cross-section fibers horns. |
|
12th June 2015, 05:41 AM | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Quote:
The Choora as a form, to me is clearly a 19th century creation, that's the simple part as it appears in 19th century publications, namely Lord Egerton's work. At face value, it is hard to argue the science behind the info on the sheaths but I strongly suspect the upper one to be a later knife in that sheath. I'd support this statement with the known WII and pre WWII period Indian knives of various forms using the same construction and material vs known old stuff. As far as the material of the lower older one, I see goat horn under magnification. The lower one with inserted brass pins, certainly an older Choora. Gavin |
|
12th June 2015, 11:36 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Goat horn????
Never seen one, never thought of it. Thanks |
13th June 2015, 07:07 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Moderator Comment
I suggest all participants in this thread heed the sage advice offered by Fernando, David and Ian.
I have been busy with other pressing personal matters, but I find the on-topic posts here interesting and stimulating. Accordingly, I will likely check in frequently on the discussion. Those of you who are familiar with my approach to moderation know what to expect. Those of you who are new, well, let's just say I employ a rather...blunt form of diplomacy. Andrew Vikingsword Staff |
13th June 2015, 09:36 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,716
|
Nice to see you here Andrew:-)
Always nice to see you - but when threads seem to run a bit out of hands, it is nice that there is an anchor man. Jens |
13th June 2015, 11:51 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Hello, my friend! Hope all is well with you and yours, Jens.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|