![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,734
|
Quote:
I see only two styles. The man at far left has a more expensive silver hilted dha but the others have similar swords: round straight hilts wrapped with rattan strips, in wooden scabbards wrapped with rattan strips. Standard Shan style working dha. These are the same two styles as shown in your other pictures. I just don't see anything radically different in any of these photographs. In fact, they appear remarkably consistent to me. Ian. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Yes I see your point re. the economics for individual tribespeople.
The purchase for the tea plantations, Opium plantations, timber companies, mining companies etc. Does seem highly likely, I would surmise some would then filter down to the villages. Id say your double edged DKW is a mark 2 myself. But that's just an opinion, Ive never found the paper work for their design. Heres some pictures of plainer DKW one. Is the bevel angle different on the spine to the front edge on yours? The with the perception of radically different to me was compared to identical factory made issue products. To me they look different. The Kachin levies were one of the Kachin units used by V force in ww2. Units like the Burma military police, the Assam regiment, the Burma rifles, The Assam rifles & Some gurkha regiments also enlisted some in varying proportions as I recall. {My library is not to hand at moment.} spiral Last edited by spiral; 9th September 2014 at 12:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Thanks for mentioning the levies Aiontay! Just found this short video Of the Burma rifles in ww2, using many different types of Dah to make punji sticks.
Well worth watching. Spiral linky to film! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Interestingly Ian in the PDF you link to page 37 is missing... that's the one with the Dha on it!
Fascinating how many different marks they used though! Not many Brit soldiers would want to collect the clearly British ones I doubt? I wonder if there any sales records left? If the made dha for 50 odd years, they must have been selling a fair few! spiral |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
It seems the national archives have many records of Brades etc. apparently.
The 1878 & 1951 catalogue do not included the so called Kachin dha or dah. In your experience Ian what percentage of pre.1950 dha are monosteel or shear steel, compared to the laminated & hairpin patterns? spiral |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,734
|
Quote:
I have not etched all of my dha, and many more that I have handled have not been etched either, so it's really hard to say how many are laminated. The older ones (pre 1900) that I etched were laminated, but not particularly bold patterns, sometimes best seen on the spine of the blade. As you know, hardened edges are found on some of the old dha. First half of the 20th C dha I have seen very few examples of monosteel among those I have etched--perhaps 5-10%--but that is an educated guess and not based on a sample of any great number because I have not looked specifically for lamination on many of them. I have most of my dha collection packed away at the moment because we are moving house in the next few months, so can't really be any more specific. I did etch a number of recently made dha (made in the last 40 years) about 10 years ago and found them all to be unlaminated, but those were all of low quality blades and obviously made for the tourist trade/returning servicemen/etc. Ian. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Quote:
Thanks Ian, I ve had very similar experiences with kukri. By WW2 most mono steel, before & early WW1 mostly shear or blister or laminated in some way. Some very high quality mono steel kukris in the 1920s though. spiral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Quote:
Of the swords we collectively refer to as "dah", "dha", or "daab", I have only seen a handful with obvious laminate construction prior to etching. One such is pictured below, with the Burmese date of 1242 Chulasakarat (1880 C.E.) inlaid at the forte in gold (previously believed to be brass). The blade is extremely thin, for this type of weapon, light, flexible and razor-sharp. One of the finest Continental SEA sword blades I have ever seen. It also appears in an early W.D. Oldman catalog. Many (even most) have differentially-hardened edges. Some have inserted edges similar to Chinese san-mei, and I have one very fine example that exhibits a crystalline structure when etched/polished I would like to believe is crucible-steel (but more likely shear ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Quote:
Sadley never had one, seen 2 in small UK auctions in the last 14 years, but one was before the kukris , so I couldn't bid high enough & the other time it was after the kukris & Id spent my money. Looking back I should have got the Dha... The kukri were good , but A dha like that is special I think. Sounds like you love that 1242 Chulasakarat dha, for a senior person then if thin light & razor sharp! {Not to mention a gold inlay.} No utility work for that one! Have you any links or good pics of the one with crystalline structure to share? It would be fascinating to see. spiral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,734
|
Quote:
From memory, the bevel angle was a little flatter on the cutting edge versus the back edge, but I don't have that one with me at the moment. Ian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Quote:
spiral |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|