Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 18th September 2013, 11:14 AM   #6
sirupate
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 373
Default

Even the then War Office got confused on the making of the Mk4
“Jack Wilkinson Latham (MD at Wilkinson’s from 1935-1952) had a tussle with the War office (Now MOD) over a contract Wilkinson’s had for Kukri in 1951 marked WSC and 1951, of which 1,400 were manufactured. This was placed with Wilkinson’s as the War office was alarmed of what was perceived as to frequent replacement of Kukris.
It was noted that the inspection tolerance on the Notch (Kaura) were very, very tight. When this was queried with the Chief Inspector of Small Arms, Wilkinson Latham was told that the notch is a SIGHT and subject to the same inspection tolerances as a Rifle sight, Wilkinson Latham explained at length about the notch as being a traditional symbol and gave the CISA a short discourse on the history of the Kukri. At last, the CISA relented and the same manufacturing tolerances as the rest of the blade were applied.”
sirupate is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.