Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11th January 2013, 02:19 PM   #1
Andi
Member
 
Andi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Halstenbek, Germany
Posts: 203
Default

Some objects of the Deutsches Historisches Museum Berlin, Germany.


Handgonne inventory No. V 87/15 dated ca 1450
Calibre 2,7, weight 2.320 g, Length 48 cm
http://www.dhm.de/datenbank/dhm.php?...fld_0=MI011708

Reconstruction of the Tannenberg handgonne which looks slightly different from the original one
http://www.dhm.de/datenbank/dhm.php?...fld_0=MI011706

A Reconstruction of Tannenberg handgonne - but with HOOK ??
http://www.dhm.de/datenbank/dhm.php?...fld_0=MI011707
Attached Images
   

Last edited by Andi; 11th January 2013 at 02:27 PM. Reason: images added
Andi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2018, 06:01 PM   #2
Paddy T.
Member
 
Paddy T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Germany
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi

[...]

A Reconstruction of Tannenberg handgonne - but with HOOK ??
http://www.dhm.de/datenbank/dhm.php?...fld_0=MI011707
This example has been published in the exhibition catalogue of "Burg und Herrschaft" in the Deutsches Historisches Museum in Berlin in 2010. Following the catalogue itīs an original piece of the "Tannenberg type" and itīs dated to the early 15th century. The dating criteria are "the casted hook" and "the uncommen small caliber". The text mentions the common interpretation of the gun to be a replica of the 19th century because of the Whitworth-screw behind the ignition pan, but following the catalogue the screw is a plug for a later drilled second touchhole.

To be honest, I donīt believe the catalogue is right. The structure of the gun is very similar to the Tannenberg examples, it looks like a mixture of these two weapons and several other templates (and looks very wrong, of course ). Furthermore, the original touchhole is situated inside the pan, itīs illogical why one more touchhole should have been drilled behind it. Maybe this piece is a 19th century replica and theyīve used the screw to close a hole which was supposed to support the core of the form while casting (which is a common practice in bronze casting for statues and stuff like that, but not for guns of course), because the muzzle seems to be cast and not drilled. The patina also appears to be modern. In addition, the provenance seems unhelpful, because the hook gun was bought by the museum from a private collection in 1986.
Paddy T. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.