![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,991
|
![]()
A nice piece.
You know how much I dislike trying to classify blades from photos, but I think I'm prepared to offer an opinion on this one. Based upon the form of the metuk, form of rondha, and size, I believe this can be classified as Tuban. Tuban blades of all types were very substantial, and the metuk and rondha are much closer to Tuban form than any other. I would hope that when this has been cleaned and stained we see Tuban material. Detlef, believe me:- you do not want the blade to have a "nice pamor"; you want it to have a typical Tuban pamor which will be wos wutah or ngulit semongko, rather coarse, heavily veined, and smooth to the touch. If you're real lucky the pamor might be hair-like, and then we can attribute to Mpu Bekeljati. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|