Is it a keris and from which island?

Rick · 10th May 2010, 07:34 PM

A cousin to ?
Transitional form ?

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ighlight=sadop

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ighlight=sadop

drdavid · 10th May 2010, 10:29 PM

Maybe if we go back to the old form leads to function arguement, does this have a blumbangan (I cannot tell from the pictures). That is to say can it be held like a keris. If it cannot then we should probably not call it a keris
drd

A. G. Maisey · 10th May 2010, 11:13 PM

I have seen, I have had, and I still have pedangs with gonjo, kembang kacang, and ron dha.

A keris can have a gonjo, but not all blades with a gonjo are keris blades.

This blade has some characteristics that we might expect to see in a keris blade, but it does not come close to any dhapur I can recall.

However, the alignment of hilt to blade angle is perfect for a pedang suduk, and the hilt itself, which appears to be contemporaneous with the blade and scabbard, is a pedang hilt, rather than a keris hilt.

Note also the curve of the blade, which is towards the wadidang side of the blade, rather than the front of the blade, now imagine if this were to be mounted as a keris:- the blade curve would be in the wrong direction; a keris blade curves away from the wadidang, not towards it..

This is a pedang suduk. Mounted in a unique and peculiar way, but a pedang suduk just the same.

For origin I tend towards Palembang area:- the scabbard has Palembang characteristics, the blade has Javanese characteristics, and Javanese characteristics also occur in better Palembang blades. The hilt has been carved in an archaic style that does occur in Jawa.

Marcokeris · 11th May 2010, 02:52 PM

I would be very very happy to have one like this in my home

Sajen · 11th May 2010, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey

I have seen, I have had, and I still have pedangs with gonjo, kembang kacang, and ron dha.

A keris can have a gonjo, but not all blades with a gonjo are keris blades.

This blade has some characteristics that we might expect to see in a keris blade, but it does not come close to any dhapur I can recall.

However, the alignment of hilt to blade angle is perfect for a pedang suduk, and the hilt itself, which appears to be contemporaneous with the blade and scabbard, is a pedang hilt, rather than a keris hilt.

Note also the curve of the blade, which is towards the wadidang side of the blade, rather than the front of the blade, now imagine if this were to be mounted as a keris:- the blade curve would be in the wrong direction; a keris blade curves away from the wadidang, not towards it..

This is a pedang suduk. Mounted in a unique and peculiar way, but a pedang suduk just the same.

For origin I tend towards Palembang area:- the scabbard has Palembang characteristics, the blade has Javanese characteristics, and Javanese characteristics also occur in better Palembang blades. The hilt has been carved in an archaic style that does occur in Jawa.

Very conclusive arguments. And the sheat has indeed Palembang characteristics. Thank you Alan.

Sajen · 11th May 2010, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick

A cousin to ?
Transitional form ?

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ighlight=sadop

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ighlight=sadop

Now I know why I have had in mind a possible origin from Borneo. But I think that Alan is mostly correct by his statements.

Rick · 11th May 2010, 05:37 PM

I expect he is .
We'll keep the thread here even though it's not a keris .

Henk · 11th May 2010, 08:02 PM

Looking in the books by Tammens i see pictures of a keris cundrik. Also a keris blade with sword features. Could it be something like that??

Just a thought.

A. G. Maisey · 12th May 2010, 01:15 PM

Yes Henk, there is no doubt that the form of the blade alone does bear a resemblance to both the dhapur cengkrong and cundrik, however, when we are dealing with the keris we have rather stringernt and restrictive parameters within which to work. The fact that a blade bears a resemblance to a keris does not make it a keris. In the case of this blade it appears that apart from the formless gonjo, also we have those ill placed ron dha.

Quite simply this blade alone lacks the characteristics required to make it a keris blade.

And that's if we consider only the blade.

When we consider the entire weapon, which we must, because it is an entire weapon that has been presented for comment, we have the blade mounted with a pedang hilt, not a keris hilt.

Based upon what can be seen in these photos, this weapon cannot be classified as a keris, but can be classified as pedang.

Because it is a pedang for stabbing, it is a pedang suduk, or pedang tusuk. We can call it a keris-like pedang, but cannot call it a pedang-like keris.

Henk · 12th May 2010, 01:34 PM

Alan,

Thank you for your answer. Very clear.

Sajen,

I'm very curious to the tang of the blade. Can you remove the hilt and make a picture of the tang?

Sajen · 12th May 2010, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Henk

Alan,

Thank you for your answer. Very clear.

Sajen,

I'm very curious to the tang of the blade. Can you remove the hilt and make a picture of the tang?

Hello Henk,

the item isn't in my hands (until now) and the pictures also not taken with my camera. But I contact the owner and he told me that the handle is very strong fixed to the blade and it's impossible for him to open it.

But you're right, a picture from the tang/pesi would maybe helpful.

Best regards,

Detlef

10th May 2010, 07:34 PM	#1
Rick Vikingsword Staff Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 6,336	Hmmm A cousin to ? Transitional form ? http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ighlight=sadop http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ighlight=sadop

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10th May 2010, 10:29 PM	#2
drdavid Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 372	Maybe if we go back to the old form leads to function arguement, does this have a blumbangan (I cannot tell from the pictures). That is to say can it be held like a keris. If it cannot then we should probably not call it a keris drd

10th May 2010, 11:13 PM	#3
A. G. Maisey Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 6,987	I have seen, I have had, and I still have pedangs with gonjo, kembang kacang, and ron dha. A keris can have a gonjo, but not all blades with a gonjo are keris blades. This blade has some characteristics that we might expect to see in a keris blade, but it does not come close to any dhapur I can recall. However, the alignment of hilt to blade angle is perfect for a pedang suduk, and the hilt itself, which appears to be contemporaneous with the blade and scabbard, is a pedang hilt, rather than a keris hilt. Note also the curve of the blade, which is towards the wadidang side of the blade, rather than the front of the blade, now imagine if this were to be mounted as a keris:- the blade curve would be in the wrong direction; a keris blade curves away from the wadidang, not towards it.. This is a pedang suduk. Mounted in a unique and peculiar way, but a pedang suduk just the same. For origin I tend towards Palembang area:- the scabbard has Palembang characteristics, the blade has Javanese characteristics, and Javanese characteristics also occur in better Palembang blades. The hilt has been carved in an archaic style that does occur in Jawa.

11th May 2010, 02:52 PM	#4
Marcokeris Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Italy Posts: 928	I would be very very happy to have one like this in my home

11th May 2010, 05:37 PM	#7
Rick Vikingsword Staff Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 6,336	I expect he is . We'll keep the thread here even though it's not a keris .

11th May 2010, 08:02 PM	#8
Henk Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,209	Looking in the books by Tammens i see pictures of a keris cundrik. Also a keris blade with sword features. Could it be something like that?? Just a thought.

12th May 2010, 01:15 PM	#9
A. G. Maisey Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 6,987	Yes Henk, there is no doubt that the form of the blade alone does bear a resemblance to both the dhapur cengkrong and cundrik, however, when we are dealing with the keris we have rather stringernt and restrictive parameters within which to work. The fact that a blade bears a resemblance to a keris does not make it a keris. In the case of this blade it appears that apart from the formless gonjo, also we have those ill placed ron dha. Quite simply this blade alone lacks the characteristics required to make it a keris blade. And that's if we consider only the blade. When we consider the entire weapon, which we must, because it is an entire weapon that has been presented for comment, we have the blade mounted with a pedang hilt, not a keris hilt. Based upon what can be seen in these photos, this weapon cannot be classified as a keris, but can be classified as pedang. Because it is a pedang for stabbing, it is a pedang suduk, or pedang tusuk. We can call it a keris-like pedang, but cannot call it a pedang-like keris.

12th May 2010, 01:34 PM	#10
Henk Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,209	Alan, Thank you for your answer. Very clear. Sajen, I'm very curious to the tang of the blade. Can you remove the hilt and make a picture of the tang?