Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 21st April 2005, 05:26 PM   #1
Dajak
Member
 
Dajak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
Post Jimpul

There is a lot off misunderstanding what is a Jimpul and what not .
If we use The Shelford provisional classification of the swords of the Sarawak Tribes presented 12th Novenber 1901 we see that Mr Albert Zonneveld made a big mistake at page 57 of his book.
The mandau 165 is not a Jimpul I asked him why he put this one between the Jimpuls and his answer was that he couldn't find a classification for the Mandau.
So the information given is incorrect and used by many people as a Jimpul wich
is incorrect.
If someone wanna have information about weapons of Borneo just ask and I try to answer the questions.
I am specialised in the weapons off the Iban use .
Dajak is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.