Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 6th August 2007, 12:37 AM   #7
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Naturally each one has his own opinnion, we were all made to be different.
This is an Ethnographic Arms and Armour Forum.
In the assumption that firearms are dislikeable because we have carried them far too much in the past, i personaly don't see any difference between them and edged weapons, as the purpose is or has been precisely the same ... just a question of time or context. Active firearms, same as active white arms, are forcingly and deeply comdemnable. One basic reason i see for contemplating old weapons, fire or edged being not different, is to remind us what we should hate to use, to stop man being the only species that hunts its own kind. Some other reasons woul be consumism and aesthetics, simple or mechanicaly animated. Its a question of taste.
With all respect.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.