Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 30th October 2024, 02:31 PM   #1
Rapier's Delight
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2024
Posts: 9
Default Brothers from a different bladesmith - Two quite similar small swords

Hello everyone,

after years of lurking and passively learning from you all, I figured it would not be a bad idea to become a more productive member of this society (or that's the hope, at least).

So for my first post I just wanted to share two small swords I own, which share a lot of characteristics, in terms of measurements and feel, though not necessarily in style. The handling similarity is so striking, I now tend to think about them as a pair, though they most definitely are not, and were not even bought together.

Anyway this is my introduction post. Happy to be here, and happy to hear your thoughts on these two pieces.

Here they are in full.
The bivalve guard one is 107 cm long and weighs 505 grams
The one with the disc guard is 106,5 cm long and weighs 496 grams

Name:  20241030_123931.jpg
Views: 335
Size:  113.4 KB

The hilts are very similar in size, thought there are obvious differences, with the bivalve one being more stocky and with shorter quillons, while the other one has more thin quillins that protrude further.

Both have usable finger rings, althou there are slight differences here too. The ones on the bivalve hook onto the top of the guard, helping secure it in place, while the rings on the disc guard sword do not make contact with the guard.

Name:  20241030_124010.jpg
Views: 334
Size:  141.2 KB

Another difference is in the shape of the quillon blocks. One is more blocky and angular, the other more rounded.

Name:  20241030_124029.jpg
Views: 333
Size:  114.0 KB
Name:  20241030_124037.jpg
Views: 335
Size:  106.9 KB

As mentioned the guards are different in both shape and decoration (or lack thereof)

Pommels are both round-ish, with one being pierced to match the decorations on the guard shells, and the other being solid, but decorated

Name:  20241030_124055.jpg
Views: 337
Size:  84.4 KB

Name:  20241030_124113.jpg
Views: 340
Size:  81.5 KB

Name:  20241030_124138.jpg
Views: 336
Size:  68.0 KB

Name:  20241030_124151.jpg
Views: 336
Size:  58.4 KB

But the owner of the disc hilted one was not a total minimalist, and did seem to enjoy some basic decoration on the other side of the guard.

Name:  20241030_124417.jpg
Views: 335
Size:  70.2 KB

As for the blades they are both decently flexible and nimble, and have a median ridge that runs along the length of the blade almost to the tip. However, while the blade of the bivalve sword seems to have more of a flat diamond section, the faces on the disc hilt one are hollow-ground, so the similarities are more superficial than the photos may show.

Name:  20241030_124235.jpg
Views: 336
Size:  56.6 KB
Name:  20241030_124254.jpg
Views: 338
Size:  54.0 KB

So, hopefully my test at formatting posts is successful, and you enjoy these two swords!
Rapier's Delight is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Tags
smallswords


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.