![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 539
|
![]()
Hi
I finished some work on the attached sword. it is of a type that has been discussed before http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...errated+tulwar Looking at the handle and the overall sword it is pretty devoid of any decoration. Now the sword cane to me with a lot of damage, namely the forward facing arm of the bifurcated blade was snapped at the central hole off and lost by previous owner. I fashioned a 20 cm replacement blade part replacement from an old sword blade that was v v rusted and pitted and ground in the serrations and welded it into (place oxo acetylene) I should have taken pictures of the process but I taught I was documenting a failure so I have no pictures of before. I have included a close up of the failure point, I was not able to get the serrated teeth just right here but I don't think it is too noticeable, if I ever get a TIG welder I reckon I could do a better job but I am OK at Gas welding. I am letting the red rust age the repair and once i think it is a good match I will clean and stabilise. I know this is pushing the restoration and repair of ethnographic items so apologies , I just needed a project for Covid and this kept me occupied for a few evenings, without the repair it was just a nothing sword anyway ( I feel) Now this is obvious a failure in design of a weapon as it is manufacturing a v v weak part into the blade which leads me to summarise that it is not a fighting sword and only for show. But the handle is so non decorative it does not look to be a show item. So do you think this is a decorative sword or a fighting item with a big flaw in design. Any idea of age? Regards, Ken |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|