![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 26
|
![]() Quote:
Hello Ian, There has been a previous thread that talks about a kampilan potentially being Visayan, which is here: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=4469 There has also been depictions of Visayans using the kampilan in Filipino media such as the tv show: "amaya" and wondered how accurate that is in depicting ancient Visayans. As someone who is passionate in uncovering artifacts that may have been lost during the pre-hispanic times, I always assumed that the lack of the Kampilan and kris is a result of Visayans being under Spanish colonization and not because they never made them. Likewise, using the kris, armor and many other things have been abandoned during the era of the Spanish empire in favor of using the famous bolo due to many Filipinos being farmers/workersof the land. Its no completely unheard of to hear that Visayans imported long swords from foreign nations which is why I don't recall the Visayans choice of using mostly short swords a definite one. Martial arts is a debatable topic as it is claimed by many that it is primarily hispanic in origin and is non-existent prior to colonization. Sorry for the long post, but propagating the Visayans using the kampilan and not mostly just their knives or short swords doesn't exactly fit well for a people surrounded by other(s) use of longer blades. Especially that somehow a people such as the Thai or Moros are able to make and use them while the Visayans do not. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|