Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 17th May 2018, 12:43 AM   #10
jagabuwana
Member
 
jagabuwana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 291
Default

1) So where we seem to arrive at now is that sapukala/sepokal is not a dhapur, it is instead generic description for keris lurus Bugis. The next question that comes to mind then is, can a Bugis sepokal blade also be classified with a dhapur, or is the generic term sepokal only used when it has not been fashioned according to a dhapur?

2) Thinking ahead here. Seeing as this is a Bugis style keris, would it be improper to dress it with components other than those that are typically Bugis such as a pistol grip ukiran? Is there a convention or ethic around selecting dressings according to the style or origin of the wilah?

For what it's worth, I too appreciate the precision in the use of language. Personally for me it makes for better learning and comprehension, and your point is understood clearly, Alan.

Best,

Novan
jagabuwana is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.