![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Comparison of features: Cauc. Bukh. Afgh. Mil. Khyber
Blade: Wide at the root, narrows toward the tip NO YES NO YES Scabbard: Suspended edge up YES NO YES NO Tucked under the belt NO YES NO YES Handle: Eared YES NO YES NO # of rivets 2-3 4-5 3 3-5 Bolster NO Variable YES YES Grip strap NO YES Variable YES Small, rounded pommel YES +/-none Large +/- none From there I conclude that Afghani military "pseudoshashka" shares quite a lot of features with the Caucasian one ( transmitted through the Cossacks), whereas Bukharan guardless saber shares a lot of features with Khyber and virtually none with the Caucasian pattern. If anybody wants to offer modifications, you are more than welcome. Just I am not sure about the weight: the proverb about shashka being light, fast etc ( see Gavin's entry) referred to the earliest examples carried by Circassians. We know very, very few true Circassian samples, the majority of the 19th century examples are from Daghestan, Chechnya and Georgia proper ( Tiflis) Those were not as massive as Afghani military "pseudoshashkas", but still had quite a mass to them. Many used European cavalry blades PS, I can't seem to format the table properly. Anybody can help? Last edited by ariel; 10th August 2016 at 09:01 PM. |
![]() |
|
|