![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,885
|
![]() Quote:
I don't trust everyone........but I will tell you that if Oliver says it, you better believe it! He says more in just a few well chosen words than a lot of arms scholars can put together in many (including me ![]() So that was a serious question (or statement?) on photos being required as proof of the weapons appearing in these Durbars, as well noted by Ariel ? That particular prerequisite seems rather humorous in this context, as I would imagine many archaeological and anthropological papers and texts must be rendered inconsequential as many assertions concerning artifacts do not have photographic proof. There weren't many cameras around before the 1850s (at least as far as I know). In any case, Oliver perfectly responded to this (I believe tongue in cheek question?) insistence on photographic proof of weaponry at durbars. This was in my opinion well placed as it illustrated the sort of weaponry, and clearly somewhat theatrical or exaggerated types of costume etc. were extant in these events. The British Raj and many colonial circumstances in various countries and regions lent well to the cottage industry of supplying souveniers to both occupying forces and whatever tourism might have developed by visitors. These items were inherently of traditional forms, and meant to be impressive. They were not of the quality of diplomatic gifts or presentation items, but as Ariel has noted, have gained their own historic value as pertains to the events in which they might have been emplaced. To speak of these kinds of items dismissively seems unwarranted when being shown in good faith for discussion. I would share this little note here for consideration: " ...I was once told that it was said of Laking that he would always find something kind to say about a fellow collectors object". re: Sir Guy Francis Laking (1875-1919) arms collector and historian -"Arms & Armour Study in Edwardian Britain" Sid Blair and Michael Lacy (1999) I guess sort of the mark of a gentleman. I know I choose to try to follow that lead......but not all collectors do. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|