Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 3rd April 2016, 01:11 PM   #2
harrywagner
Member
 
harrywagner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 373
Default

Good question Kubur. I have been wondering about that myself. I am far from an expert, but can't resist adding my two cents worth. I think the basic style has evolved slowly over time (except for the Royal Khanjar), making age determination a challenge.

I have several Jambiya that have been vetted as early 20th, including one that I think may be much older. They differ only slightly in appearance until you examine the blade. Then the difference is striking. The knife I am referring to is a Zabidi style ( http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=20476 ). I have shared photos of it with several people who I consider experts and they all concluded it was early 20th. The blade appears to be the result of a primitive forging technique. None of the other early 20th Jambiya I have handled have a blade anything like this.

I assert that the basic style was a slow evolution and that the blade is the key to identifying the older ones. I am often wrong though so take that for what it is worth!

Harry
harrywagner is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.