26th September 2005, 11:29 PM | #32 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
I'm looking forward to seeing your work. I hope your client recovers from his wounds. What the hell was he doing anyway?! About the lamellar armour, because it was made of rigid plates, it did indeed provide an excellent defence against arrows compared to mail, however it had quite a few weaknesses: it wasn't particularly good against swords and sabres because the lacing could be cut, furthermore because it was quite rigid, vulnerable areas like the armpits and groin were left exposed. Mail and plate armour provided a compromise: rigid plates over the abdomen and back, mail over the groin and limbs. Another problem with lamellar of course was that the lacing would get soaked in wet weather increasing the weight, and the lacing sometimes got infested with lice etc. This picture is a Tibetan lamellar armour from the Rubens server, the actual armour is in the Royal Armouries (Although it wasn't there when I last visited the the RA). http://rubens.anu.edu.au/raid1cdroms...l/P1015070.JPG Here's another 15th century mail and plate armour from the Royal Armouries: According to the label it's Turkish, According to Robinson's "Oriental Armour" though it's Mamluk. It does ressemble the mamluk mail and plate shirts in the Topqapi. |
|
|
|