![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
The sword (picture) I posted is indeed provenanced to Edward III .....
http://www.stgeorges-windsor.org/archives/blog/?p=89 I cannot though, discover the weight of the sword and whether the edge is blunt or is/has been sharpened. A little research on 'two handers' came up with this page.... which is an interesting read......... http://www.thearma.org/essays/2HGS.html The weights of some of these swords suggests that blade thickness is comparable to some shorter swords. Due to armour... logic would dictate that blades would be thick-ish (mid rib) to withstand the forces generated on impact. I am sure the longer length of blade would ....though a number of physical reasons....the increased speed/momentum of the tip in an 'arcing' strike, the 'laws' of leverage, the combined 'power' of two arms would greatly increase the impact energy and the resulting stresses imposed to the blade. I get the impression that knights using 'two handers' were 'shock troops'...disrupting the advances of the opposing knights. I know many Kings of the period lead by example, if this sword was truly used by Edward then he really must have been 'in amongst it'. ![]() Richard ![]() ![]() Hi Jim ![]() we posted at similar times .....definately worth reading the link above Regards David Last edited by katana; 8th February 2010 at 10:52 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|