|  | 
|  23rd October 2021, 01:08 AM | #13 | 
| Member Join Date: Sep 2021 
					Posts: 15
				 |   
			
			I don't know what we can learn based on the 2 new kukri I posted in my last messages. I suppose we can determine it probably is not a mismatch after all. It is however very strange that the scabbard is so much oversized: It's complicated to understand why they put so much effort into making a nice scabbard and so little effort into sizing the scabbard correctly. Based on the new evidence are all the kukri I posted of the same period? Is the estimated period still second quarter of the 20th century? Are the kukri genuine/ antique/ usable kukri's or does the fact that I found 4 similar examples mean they should be regarded as tourist kukri's? | 
|   |   | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 |