8th September 2015, 08:27 PM | #11 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,972
|
Quote:
I also looked back into material on Hounslow, and found that this would not have corresponded with contemporary Hounslow practices in markings. While for a time I thought that Hounslow did not use the 'wolf' or 'fox' markings, I found contrary evidence in that they did indeed use the familiar running wolf chiseled mark. Since Hounslow had ceased by the 1660s, it does not seem that such practice would accede into the Harvey timeline, nor would the smiths of Hounslow have used the contrary figure of a noticeably tailed fox as used by the Harvey's. I have personally always felt that the fox used by the Harveys was perhaps a 'nod' to the Hounslow smiths in a rather commemorative sense, as the reputation certainly would remain known then. Thank you so much, as always, for the wonderful examples you continue to post here, and for keeping this thread going!! Fernando, excellent suggestion on the compellingly plausible interpretation of SOLIDEO GLORIA . Often the literal interpretation of words, terms and phrases can be rather difficult to understand properly in the mindset of our times, but such dimensional placement into the context and times of the weapon really makes a difference! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|