![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Examples of this pommel style which were obviously original never show a distinct beak (i. e. both, beak and crest, heavily stylized). Since Detlef's examples has a distinct beak and also the flow of lines where the crest could have been seems to be unusual, I'd guess that the original pommel got recarved a long time ago.
Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|