Deadliest Warrior - Roman Centurion vs Rajput Warrior

pallas · 26th May 2010, 09:54 PM

some of that rajput armor looked more like mughal armor. i thought rajputs went into battle much more lightly armored than that...............you learn something everyday i guess.

and i thought the chakram/quoit was a sikh weapon??? i remember some british writer saying that the sikhs "kept their quoits (chakram) under their turbans so as to conceal them"

there are so many weapons they could have used. i guess they picked the 4 they thought would be most effective...

i agree with the outcome, the centurion was a better warrior in a legion than on his own.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

26th May 2010, 09:54 PM	#7
pallas Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 53	some of that rajput armor looked more like mughal armor. i thought rajputs went into battle much more lightly armored than that...............you learn something everyday i guess. and i thought the chakram/quoit was a sikh weapon??? i remember some british writer saying that the sikhs "kept their quoits (chakram) under their turbans so as to conceal them" there are so many weapons they could have used. i guess they picked the 4 they thought would be most effective... i agree with the outcome, the centurion was a better warrior in a legion than on his own.