29th May 2005, 07:43 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Polish???? Karabela
What do you think about it?
I think it is Persian/Turkish, and not Polish (which determined an outrageous price that was disproportionate to the quality and the condition of the sword) The handguard is not Polish at all. Beyond that... who can tell? The sword is in such sorry shape... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEWA%3AIT&rd=1 |
29th May 2005, 09:45 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 452
|
Ariel, Polish karabelas must be more expensive than Turkish and Persian ones? Why?Are they very rare? The cross guard tip form looks more like Persian than Turkish to me but the blade can be European, the inscription is in Latin alphabet, not?
Last edited by erlikhan; 30th May 2005 at 01:47 AM. |
29th May 2005, 11:40 PM | #3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,200
|
I watched that one soar out of my range and also wondered what someone thought they saw in it. Could be Persian but the blade does seem to be European. Perhaps someone here will shed light on why it went for as much as it did.
Ian. |
30th May 2005, 07:13 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Poland, Krakow
Posts: 418
|
resources
Gentlemen!
I don't why it was sold for so much money, maybe "Polish" in the name of the object is some kind magical . Instead, I think it is a time to shed a light on karabelas, based on some resources. I know the only one monograph, and it is article of prof. Zdzislaw Zygulski, who has took a try of classification the karabelas sabres in 1978. For me it's the only known article on this sabres at all. Because it was a try, I think there are some exceptions, which weren't include by the Author. Anyway I hope this excerpts and quotes will bring something new for you: Professor Zygulski has made a classification and has divided karabelas on two basic groups: Turkish as a first group and Polish as a second. These two groups are divided further: (only excerpts, I'm sorry for any grammar mistakes during translation and overall shortcut. Images below) Zdzislaw Zygulski, Karabela i szabla orla (The Karabela and the Eagle Sabre), Studia do dziejów dawnego uzbrojenia i ubioru wojskowego (Studies in history of old arms and uniforms), T. VII, Krakow, 1978Polish classification was started from the 18th century, but we can add here all the karabelas mentioned in group A and B, most of them were Turkish, accepted in Poland, but there were many of them copied or altered in Poland. What is worth of mention - here we have only Turkish and Polish karabelas without Persian and other. So there is still much to do! As we can see our Ebay karabela is similiar to the description of group A and B. It could be Turkish because it was made ca. middle of 17th century, it has European blade, persian-like quillons (as in group A), but there is problem with rivets - I can see only two instead of four or three at least. Maybe it is one exception which wasn't include by the Author? Anyway grip is IMO similar to those from group B. Of course this classification won't set in order all the mess with karabelas but it can be the first step, while it is not the first time we are discussing about those sabres. Here are the images - illustrations for mentioned groups. As the last photo, karabela from my museum - let's make more mess - described as Polish from 17th century (isn't it similar to this one from ebay anyway? ) |
30th May 2005, 09:33 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
wow! Thanks!
|
30th May 2005, 10:31 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 452
|
Thanks for the info. Well, "Karabela" means "black curse" in Turkish language. So there is nothing Persian karabela, but just Persian type quilloned Turkish karabela right? Most of the Polish karabelas are also partially or completely Turkish made too. That can explain why they are often found in Turkey, but certainly more in very close past and were sold for any ordinary sword prices. Especially in western Black Sea region, as far as I heard. I'd like to understand what makes them so expensive abroad? Just because their hilt form proves they were produced latest early 1700s or before?
Last edited by erlikhan; 30th May 2005 at 10:58 PM. |
16th June 2005, 04:21 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Yet another one!
It is astonishing how the words "karabela" and "Polish" attract buyers! IMHO, this is a South Arabian, most likely Yemeni, Saif. Interesting, what kind of price the same sword would command had the description been correct? http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEWA%3AIT&rd=1 |
|
|