![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poole England
Posts: 441
|
![]()
Another oddity from my collection.
This one has puzzled me for a long time and I hope that someone will come up with an explanation as to what it is. I have never seen this seemingly Barong / Parang Nabor combination before. The hilt looks real and has some age. The blade looks as though it has been there for a long time, see the photo showing the blade / hilt point of attachement. I am not convinced that the blade is as old as the hilt. The scabbard is definitely a lot more recent. I am looking for an opinion as the whether it is a known weapon, a hybrid or something that someone " Threw" together on a wet Sunday afternoon. ( Do I hear the word Souvenir ? ![]() As usual, all comments welcome. Regards Royston |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
I see what you mean - looks like an Indonesian blade with a form of Yakan barong hilt.
Interesting. Another possibility is Borneo where there are Moros also and lots of mixing as well...... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
This is the blade off the langai tingal
Is it possible to take off the Handle ??? Ben |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Interesting one of a kind sword.
NW Borneo seems a probable origin based on the different influences. What is strange is that except Iban/Sea Dayak (Langgai Tinggang blade) and Moro (Barong hilt) it also has (Borneo) Malay motifs on the blade? So 3 different ethnic groups merged in one sword! A wild guess would be that it belonged to an Iban Dayak who went on raids together with Moros and then later converted to Islam (which made him change the hilt and add the motifs to his blade) ![]() Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poole England
Posts: 441
|
![]()
Thanks Gentlemen, this has given me something to work on.
Ben, the handle is firmly fixed, it would need hard hammer blows to get it off. I think I will leave it as it is. VVV A wild guess would be that it belonged to an Iban Dayak who went on raids together with Moros and then later converted to Islam (which made him change the hilt and add the motifs to his blade) Michael, Amazing powers of deduction. Er, can you tell me what his name was ? ![]() ![]() ![]() thanks again Royston |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,287
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Seriously though; heating the blade may render it removable from the hilt . |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 20
|
![]()
What leads/clues are we looking for if the handle can be removed?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
![]()
SEVERAL YEARS AGO I BOUGHT A COLLECTION OF VARIOUS PHILIPPINE SWORDS. THERE WAS ONE SWORD REFERED TO AS A GAYONG THAT HAD A MANDAU STYLE HANDLE. YOUR SWORD REMINDS ME OF THE EXAMPLES IN THAT COLLECTION WHICH WAS COLLECTED IN 1944 THRU 1946 IN MINDANAO.
SEARCH IN THE OLD FORUMS UNDER TOPICS , "VANDOO'S MORO PIECES" (GAYONG) IS THE DAYAK LIKE SWORD, POSTED 6-20-2002 BY RICK, UNFORTUNATELY THE PICTURES ON SOME OF THE OTHER ITEMS IN THE COLLECTION ARE GONE BUT THE INFORMATION IS STILL THERE AND THE PICTURES OF THE GAYONG ARE STILL THERE. YOUR SWORD MAY HAVE SIMULAR ORGINS TO THE ONES IN THIS COLLECTION. A VERY NICE SWORD. AS TO REMOVING THE HANDLE THE ONLY THING THAT COULD BE LEARNED FROM THAT IS IF THE BLADE IS OLDER OR NEWER THAN THE HANDLE. THE BLADE LOOKS VERY CLEAN AND IF THE TANG IS AS CLEAN I WOULD SUSPECT THE BLADE AND FITTINGS WERE MADE AT THE SAME TIME. THE ITEMS IN MY COLLECTION MENTIONED ABOVE DO NOT SHOW MUCH WEAR AND MOST OF THEM NEVER SAW ANY USE AND THE BLADES WERE MADE AT THE SAME TIME AS THE FITTINGS. THE MANDAU HANDLE DOSEN'T SHOW MUCH USE BUT WAS NOT MADE AT THE SAME TIME AS THE BLADE AS FAR AS I CAN TELL. MOST OF THE ITEMS IN THE COLLECTION DUE TO THE PROVENANCE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE ANY LATER THAN 1946 AND WERE PROBABLY MADE A BIT BEFORE THAT, BUT ARE LIKE NEW AS THEY WERE STORED VERY WELL. Last edited by VANDOO; 11th August 2008 at 06:44 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 999
|
![]()
Yakan..yes, but not necessarily a Barung, maybe orginally it could have been mounted on a................................
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Thanks for posting the Pira Kino. It's good to be reminded about that not everything always has to be "by the book".
I had a look at the old post of Gayong and strange Moro weapons etc. Is there any possibility to republish those pictures again on the forum, PLEASE? A Gayang in Sabah is like a mandau/ilang but with a flat blade. They were also produced on Borneo but not with the kind of blade shape like the one posted in the old thread. On removing the handle there could of course be a commercial reason as well... Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
Thanks Kino, I plain forgot......
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Langai tingal is an Iban sword so blade is Iban
But to see if it is old need to be the Handle off If the Handle is off I can see if it is old style or newly made that s why I ask can the handle off . Ben |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poole England
Posts: 441
|
![]()
Ben,
I will be back home soon and I will attempt to take the handle off. I'll let you know the outcome. Royston |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poole England
Posts: 441
|
![]()
Ben
So far I have had no success getting the hilt off. I tried with a hot air gun on the blade near to the hilt and gentle tapping. Anyone got any better ideas? I am now getting even more confused with the Borneo swords. The only real difference I can see between the first one that Ben calls a Langgai Tinggal and the Parang Nabur that is shown here is the Krowit. Is this correct ? I have looked through several of the old threads on this subject and still cannot differentiate between Langgai Tinggal, Jimpal and Parang Naibor. Can anyone enlighten me further. Regards Royston |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
I have been told that this is Filipino, Batangas.
![]() Nice upper rank piece - best of this I have seen with all that silver... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Here is a good summary of Shelford's classification of Dayak parang based on his research in Sarawak.
http://old.blades.free.fr/swords/day...ayak_intro.htm There are however some mistakes in the tribe column but otherwise it's good to use for separating the different dayak parang. The, so called, Parang Nabur sword of Stone's is an error based on a misreading of a description of a (Parang) Nyabor. That's the reason why neither that sword, nor the kampilan (also an error in Stone's as it's not a dayak sword), is among the swords in Shelford's classification. Yours is from Philippines, not Borneo, as Jose brought up. And a top piece! Michael PS If you want more information on this it's all in the forum archives. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
VVV, actually there may be a type of kampilan that was used by Illanum migrants in Borneo, also shown in Zonneveld.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]() Quote:
Shelford specifically classifies the Dayak parang in Sarawak. Not for instance the Moro swords or swords from other ethnic groups. Michael |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,324
|
![]()
Is there a good book which tells more about the Illanums? I find very little about them in the books I have, but I am very interested to learn more about them.
Regards, Maurice |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
VVV, I now understand your point better - focus on the Sea Dayaks. Is it possible that they got kampilans from the Illanums?
Maurice, Illanums are a Moro tribe also known as the Maranao. At one time they ruled the seas as well as the northern part of Mindanao. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]() Quote:
Michael |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
The same for the kampilan as we now it has no evidence that the type that Stone suggest come from the philipine .
The story goes that this type has indonesian origen and found in Celebes or Timor . And don't forget even Shelford s is not complete he forgot to mention the parang sankit . Ben |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
So then the other sources that Zonneveld used are also wrong and the kampilan is strictly a Moro weapon - is this right? (just trying to understand)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Shelford says he doesn't deal with the kampilan in his article as it's strictly an Illanum weapon.
Foy I think also describes it as an Illanum weapon but I am not 100% sure as I don't have it at the moment. Forman (is Solc as Forman was only the designer of the book) is full of mistakes so he is not in the same league as the other sources. Hein's examples are collected by Sonne among the Sun-Dayaks (=Dusun, related to Illanums). He later writes, based on Foy, that they might originally come from the Philippines. So to me it seems that Stone is the only one of van Zonneveld's sources that attributes it to the Sea Dayaks. But Albert now and then follow this forum so maybe he would like to bring in new information on this? Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|