|  | 
|  2nd June 2024, 08:14 AM | #1 | 
| Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Austria 
					Posts: 1,912
				 |  Kris but from where 
			
			Hello, A friend of mine bought this kris and would like to learn more about it. He has been told that the blade is of meteoric iron. | 
|   |   | 
|  2nd June 2024, 09:20 AM | #2 | 
| Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Germany, Dortmund 
					Posts: 9,409
				 |   
			
			Hello Marius, It comes from Fantasy Island!    I guess that it's a most recent creation, the handle shows Balinese influence but it's non traditional carved. The blade is antique and from Java IMVHO. Nobody can say if a blade is from meteoric iron without an analysis, it's a myth to make the keris more saleable. Sorry for the bad news but I think it's better to tell the truth. Regards, Detlef | 
|   |   | 
|  2nd June 2024, 01:50 PM | #3 | 
| Member Join Date: May 2006 
					Posts: 7,085
				 |   
			
			This is so.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  2nd June 2024, 03:35 PM | #4 | 
| Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Germany, Dortmund 
					Posts: 9,409
				 |   
			
			Hello Alan, Would you agree that the blade is possibly Javanese? Regards, Detlef | 
|   |   | 
|  2nd June 2024, 07:18 PM | #5 | 
| Keris forum moderator Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Nova Scotia 
					Posts: 7,250
				 |   
			
			Detlef, i would say there is a possibility the blade could be an from Bali. The pamor reminds me of Bali work and the blade surface is polished. But i would not argue with anyone who felt strongly that it was from Java. Do we know the blade length?  I agree that this is a bit of a fantasy dress form and not suitable for traditional wear, but it is pretty unique. At least i have never seen anyone hollow out a stage horn like this to serve as a sarung. It is an interesting, though non-tradtional piece. | 
|   |   | 
|  2nd June 2024, 09:37 PM | #6 | 
| Member Join Date: May 2006 
					Posts: 7,085
				 |   
			
			Yes Detlef, possibly of Javanese manufacture. In fact a lot of keris that are in Balinese dress, & have been for many years, are Javanese. The finish on this blade is Balinese, the dress is extremely likely to have been made in Bali, the blade might have been in Bali for a long time, or it might have been polished when it was given this new dress. In the hand it might be possible to be a bit more definite, but from photos we can have a lot of hypotheticals. | 
|   |   | 
|  2nd June 2024, 09:57 PM | #7 | 
| Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Germany, Dortmund 
					Posts: 9,409
				 |   
			
			@ David, Yes, the blade could be Balinese but like Alan said, I've seen several Javanese blades in Balinese or Lombok dresses which have been polished. I would agree with Alan, that a Balinese origin could be possible but also a Javanese origin. @ Alan, Thank you, my thoughts as well. Regards, Detlef | 
|   |   | 
|  3rd June 2024, 12:40 AM | #8 | 
| Member Join Date: Mar 2018 
					Posts: 470
				 |   
			
			I think it might be an old bilah but meteoric? If it is old, then it is not meteoric as that kind of material is costly and only certain high level (rich/powerful) people can have that kind of material.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  3rd June 2024, 02:10 PM | #9 | 
| Keris forum moderator Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Nova Scotia 
					Posts: 7,250
				 |   
			
			Yeah, i was going to address that claim, but then decided to ignore it. The odds of meteoric pamor in this keris is extremely unlikely. The meteoric pamor claim is one you often hear from people trying too hard to sell a keris. I would say that the blade is indeed sincerely old. Frankly the older the blade is the more likely there would not be meteorite in the pamor as i have still never seen any evidence that the material was used in any keris prior to the Prambanan meteorite fall in the late 18th century. It is a debate that has been argued so many times that is seem useless to enter into again unless someone can truly offer some valid evidence that the use of meteorite in keris was an acknowledged process BEFORE the Prambanan Fall.
		 Last edited by David; 4th June 2024 at 01:47 PM. | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |