![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jul 2007 
				
				
				
					Posts: 272
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			ho can help me with this kind of dapur 
		
		
		
			regards semar  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,740
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hello Semar, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	From the pics and although they are small it seems to me that the sogokan was carved more recently than the blade itself (black color and uneven shape). What do you think? Regards  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jul 2007 
				
				
				
					Posts: 272
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			when i know something about this blad but one thing i dont belive that the sogokan is carved recentley but thats what i think because the uneven shape  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	regards semar  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,740
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Nobody interested in this subject? 
		
		
		
			Semar, what strikes me in the sogokans of your blade is that they are straight and don't look harmonious, rather than following the curve of the first luk, see a similar blade with 11 luk and 2 other detailed pics showing what I mean. I cannot identify the dapur as I don't know if the sogokans are original or not. Regards  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | |
| 
			
			 Keris forum moderator 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2006 
				Location: Nova Scotia 
				
				
					Posts: 7,250
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  
		 | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 7,085
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Jean, the vast bulk of all keris made since, say, the 1600's, are very ordinary keris. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Why? Because ordinary people cannot afford to pay for the services of competent artists. Most keris in existence do not come within a bull's roar of observing the parameters that make even a halfway decent keris. Semar's keris is original and worn. Look at the kruwingan. What would this keris have had to look like before sogokan were cut to have kruwingan like this? Further, why would anybody want to cut sogokan into an old, very ordinary blade? Semar, it might be possible to match this blade to something listed in a pakem, but it is far more likely that it does not follow any set down dhapur, the reasons being the same that I have mentioned above. In respect of tangguh, many half-educated people would give this blade as either Pengging or Pajang, it is neither.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,740
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thank you David and Alan   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jul 2007 
				
				
				
					Posts: 272
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thank you guys for your commend 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	i hoop for penggi because the looks semar  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |