|
12th June 2005, 05:47 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tebbetts, Missouri, USA
Posts: 49
|
Indian SLOs - Right?
There is no reason for me to preserve these are there?
Otherwise, I plan to de-rust and replace the handles. Oh, yeah and bend the tips back - they're both bent over in a U. |
12th June 2005, 08:00 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Posts: 301
|
What is an SLO?
|
12th June 2005, 09:17 AM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tebbetts, Missouri, USA
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
|
|
12th June 2005, 02:43 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 176
|
The second one, yes. The first one, it depends, if its threaded, then it probably is an SLO, if the blade stuck to the hilt (which is historically accurate), then it probably deserves to be called a 'sword'.
Anyway, I find Indian SLO's of this kind to be quite good. The blade is good, as a beater anyway. The problem is with the tangs. You can regrind the tangs, starting from the forte so that you would have a better tang, then refix it onto the hilt. There you go, you have a good, shortened beater. |
12th June 2005, 02:56 PM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
BUT WHY BOTHER ? |
|
12th June 2005, 03:37 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 176
|
Quote:
|
|
12th June 2005, 09:33 PM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tebbetts, Missouri, USA
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
I was pretty sure that the one with the red scabbard and easter-egg plastic ball for a handle would be OK to modify. |
|
12th June 2005, 09:50 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 176
|
I do not know what you mean by preserving, anyway they are probably both SLO's, if not for their hilts, then for the blades (rolled, unhardened steel).
Considering they are both new, how would you preserve them anyway? |
12th June 2005, 06:06 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,806
|
Right thats it, this site is the DB's Ask Lew.
|
|
|