|
|
|
18th March 2007, 05:08 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 31
|
Need learn more about this sword
I think this sword is beautiful but having no idea about it.
Can anyone bring more information to me? thanks a lot/   
Last edited by shangrila; 18th March 2007 at 06:35 PM. |
|
|
|
18th March 2007, 05:09 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 31
|
  
Last edited by shangrila; 18th March 2007 at 06:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
18th March 2007, 05:10 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 31
|
   Thanks again Last edited by shangrila; 18th March 2007 at 06:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
18th March 2007, 06:30 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 520
|
The pictures are not showing up for me
|
|
|
|
|
18th March 2007, 06:40 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
18th March 2007, 07:21 PM
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
The blade seems to be British, Wilkinson.
The figure on the handguard appears to have some Aztec features ( either my fantasy is running wild or the screen is blurry  ).Mexican? S. American? |
|
|
|
|
18th July 2007, 02:40 AM
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
|
I think it is an 1892 Pattern Rifle Guard Regiment sword.
I thought the dumbell cross section - as evident in the photos of your sword - was first introduced on the 1892 P, and the 1827 P only differed from the 1822 P in replacing the pipeback blade with a flatter spine? I have a 1892 P Rifle Guard sword that looks, well, exactly like this one.
|
|
|
|
|
18th July 2007, 02:49 AM
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Welcome. Glad you decided to stop lurking.
|
|
|
|
|
18th July 2007, 04:08 AM
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
