![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 841
|
![]()
Hi,
This sword measures only 76 cm in the scabbard and the blade is 53 cm long. Previously, I heard somewhere that such small daos were made for tourists. But I don't think so since both the handle and scabbard show signs of frequent wear. The sword is also nicely balanced if held at the beginning of its large hilt. Unfortunately, I don't know anything more about that sword.... (I bought it in Prague antique shop) Best, Martin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,112
|
![]()
I was informed some time ago that short Dao were carried by "Cloud Ladder" troops. Specialist siege assault soldiers who used scaling ladders.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Martin,
The polished ray skin looks genuine - a good sign. The blade seems of good quality (including the crisp fuller); OTOH, the width of the blade is much wider in the basal half while the distal half is considerably narrower - unless this was done to repair an edge damage, I am at a loss for any other reason for this shape... Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
The blade profile is correct for a Qing era short saber. They don't all widen towards the tip, regardless of length.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Philip,
Quote:
However, in the middle of the blade (red arrow) I believe seeing a sudden decrease in width to about 90% of the basal half of the blade. Do you think this really is intentional? Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 841
|
![]()
Thank you all for interesting information!
Kai, the blade is not tapered, it is an optical illusion caused by flash photography. I am attaching a new photo without flash. Best, Martin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]() Quote:
What we see here is probably a civilian weapon, and dating from the mid-19th cent. to ca. 1900. It's seen its share of wear and tear, but an honest old piece that retains its original configuration, some repairs but nothing missing, and it doesn't look like it's been monkeyed with. The touristic pieces discussed elsewhere have other stylistic characteristics so are not to be confused with this piece. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|