![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chania Crete Greece
Posts: 511
|
![]()
This was advertised as a 17th c european matchlock bandolier. I put it on discussion on teh european forum, but it was suggested that there is a strong possibility to be a non-european item, from a culture that was using matchlocks untill recently. Anyone recognise the style?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 379
|
![]()
What a fascinating topic! I'll watch it with pleasure.
I will assume with caution that this item was made in the south of the Arabian Peninsula. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,772
|
![]()
Hi Eftihis,
Not a firm ID but wool stoppers were used in bandoliers from Afghanistan. One of your pics appears to show a wool stopper. Hopefully Rickystl will come in on this as I know he has several bandoliers of different origins. Stu |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chania Crete Greece
Posts: 511
|
![]()
A similar set, was sold some years ago from Italy with the following description: A Musketeer's bandoleer dating: 17th Century provenance: Europe Leather belt with brass buckle; provided with a leather purse and eleven wooden flasks for powder doses, held together with leather straps. Small defects and damages. dimensions: length circa 97 cm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
Stu is 100% right
and it's not the first time that I see an Afghan item listed as medieval or European renaissance. Please, look at mine. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
I agree with the participants who wrote that this belt is from Afghanistan.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chania Crete Greece
Posts: 511
|
![]()
Hi Kubur, regarding yours, i have to contribute the following! However, the style of the containers on teh belt we discuss is quite different!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|